Established organizations
A program already exists. What is missing is an independent measure of whether it is working.
Home/Services/Cyber Risk and Maturity
Cyber Risk and Maturity
Established organizations need to know where the security program stands, how much risk remains, and whether spending is producing a result. We set a defensible maturity baseline against NIST CSF 2.0 or the CIS Controls, quantify the loss exposure of the scenarios that matter, and re-measure on the cadence your board and budget cycle require.
Who it is for
A program already exists. What is missing is an independent measure of whether it is working.
Oversight and disclosure obligations that need reporting management cannot produce about its own work.
Response and recovery depend on plans, playbooks, and recovery objectives nobody has tested.
What it solves
What you receive
Every engagement in this practice produces artifacts somebody outside your organization can read and rely on.
How an engagement works
Described as a sequence rather than a schedule. Duration depends on scope, and is agreed in the statement of work.
Measure capability against the framework or obligation that applies, on evidence rather than self-assessment.
Express the scenarios that matter in financial terms, so they can be compared and ranked.
Rank improvements by risk reduction against effort, sequenced for your constraints.
Repeat the measurement annually, or quarterly during active improvement, against the same baseline.
Services
Each has its own page setting out what it covers, who it is for, and what you receive.
Questions
A cybersecurity maturity assessment measures how well an organization's security capabilities are defined, implemented, measured, and improved, scored on a capability maturity model scale across domains such as governance, protection, detection, response, and recovery. The result is a baseline showing where capability is strong, where it is weak, and which improvements reduce the most risk.
Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) is a standard model for expressing cyber risk in financial terms. It estimates how often a loss event is likely to occur and how much it would cost, producing loss exposure ranges that let boards and finance leaders compare security investments by expected loss reduction.
Because readiness is a capability that can be measured like any other. Plans, playbooks, exercises, and tested recovery objectives each have a maturity level, and they are assessed on the same baseline as the rest of the program. Data Fiduciaries advises on readiness and does not provide emergency incident response.
Most established enterprises reassess annually, in line with budgeting and board reporting cycles. Organizations in active program build-out or certification acceleration benefit from quarterly measurement. Cadence is agreed with each client.
Related
Reach a clean SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, or HITRUST report without the audit becoming the project.
View practiceJudge the security of a vendor, a target, or a portfolio company before the commitment is made.
View practiceSenior security leadership at the commitment level you need, without a full-time executive hire.
View practiceThirty minutes on where your program stands against this standard, and what would have to be true for the answer to hold up.