Advice resting on technical facts
The legal question is settled by what the controls actually did, which nobody has measured.
Home/Who we serve/Law Firms and Legal Departments
Law Firms and Legal Departments
The technical expertise behind your advice
Law firms and corporate legal departments are asked to advise on obligations that depend on technical facts: whether encryption was in place, whether access was controlled, whether a program was reasonable. We provide the assessment and the expert analysis behind that advice, for your clients and for your own firm.
The pressure
What brings this buyer to an independent advisor
Matters that need an expert
A dispute or an inquiry turns on control adequacy, incident causation, or standard practice.
The firm's own obligations
Outside counsel guidelines, client security audits, and professional obligations on confidentiality and technology competence.
What we assess
What an engagement examines
- Controls measured requirement by requirement against the statute, regulation, or contract at issue.
- Whether a program met the reasonable security standard a statute, regulation, or contract applies.
- Incident causation, control adequacy, and industry standard practice, for a report or for testimony.
- The technical achievability of the security commitments in a contract or data protection agreement.
- The firm's own program against outside counsel guidelines and client security audits.
What changes
What is different afterwards
- Advice rests on measured facts rather than on a client's description of its own controls.
- A regulator's technical questions are answered accurately and on the record.
- Engagement terms, communications, and deliverables are structured so counsel can establish and maintain privilege.
- The firm can answer a client security audit without assembling the answer from scratch.
Practices
Most often engaged
Regulatory and Legal Compliance
Technical assessment behind privacy, healthcare, financial, and government obligations, often under counsel.
View practiceCyber Risk and Maturity
Measure maturity against NIST CSF or CIS, quantify exposure in dollars, and know what to fix first.
View practiceProduct and Application Security
Find what an attacker would find in your product, your APIs, and your cloud, before a customer's security review does.
View practiceThird-Party Risk and M&A
Judge the security of a vendor, a target, or a portfolio company before the commitment is made.
View practiceQuestions
Frequently asked questions
Can engagements be structured to support privilege?
Yes. When counsel retains us and directs the work to support legal advice, we structure engagement terms, communications, and deliverables to support attorney-client privilege and work product protection, which counsel establishes and maintains.
How do you handle conflicts?
Every engagement is conflict-checked at intake, and expert engagements are maintained separately from advisory relationships. Both the firm and the prospective client retain the right to decline an engagement.
Start with a confidential conversation
Thirty minutes on where your program stands, what is being asked of it, and what would have to be true for the answer to hold up.